"Connecting communities, empowering nations: Unifying the Regional and Global Economy ."

The latest tariff structure imposed by the United States on a wide range of countries is reshaping the conversation around international trade. With rates ranging from 15% to a staggering 50%, this move signals a clear shift toward a more protectionist U.S. trade posture.

Tariffs: The Numbers Speak

According to recent policy actions, Brazil tops the list, facing a 50% tariff on its exports to the U.S. Myanmar follows at 40%, while Thailand and Cambodia both see 36% duties. Several countries — including Bangladesh and Canada — are hit with 35%, while others like Sri Lanka, Libya, Iraq, and Mexico face 30%.

India, along with South Korea, Malaysia, Kazakhstan, Tunisia, and Brunei, faces 25% tariffs, while the Philippines and Vietnam are charged 20%. Even traditional trade partners like the EU and Japan are not exempt, facing 15% tariffs.

Why Is the U.S. Doing This?

These tariff increases reflect a combination of strategic, economic, and political motivations:

1. Domestic Industry Protection – The U.S. is aiming to shield its manufacturing and agricultural sectors from low-cost imports, ensuring that domestic producers remain competitive.


2. Trade Deficit Concerns – By making imports more expensive, the U.S. hopes to reduce its trade deficits, particularly with countries where it imports more than it exports.


3. Geopolitical Leverage – Tariffs can be used as a bargaining tool in broader diplomatic and economic negotiations. This is particularly relevant in regions where the U.S. wants to counter China’s growing influence.


4. Electoral Politics – With an election-driven narrative, high tariffs appeal to domestic voters concerned about job losses in manufacturing and traditional industries.

Impact on Global Trade

The ripple effects of such broad-based tariff hikes could be significant:

Supply Chain Disruption – Countries like Vietnam, India, and Malaysia have been integral to U.S. supply chains, especially as alternatives to China. Higher tariffs could force companies to reconsider sourcing strategies.

Shift in Market Dynamics – Some nations may seek to divert their exports to non-U.S. markets, accelerating regional trade pacts such as RCEP or expanding intra-Asia trade.

Inflationary Pressures in the U.S. – While tariffs protect domestic producers, they also raise import costs, potentially fueling inflation in sectors where the U.S. lacks sufficient domestic capacity.

Retaliatory Measures – Many targeted countries may respond with counter-tariffs on U.S. goods, potentially escalating into trade disputes.

India’s Position

For India, the 25% tariff represents a significant challenge, particularly in sectors like textiles, leather goods, and engineering products that cater to the U.S. market. Indian exporters will need to adopt three-pronged strategies:

Moving up the value chain to justify higher prices.

Seeking preferential market access in other countries through FTAs.

Exploring niche products that face lower competition.

The Bigger Picture

This tariff landscape reflects a post-globalization world where free trade principles are giving way to selective economic nationalism. The U.S. is no longer hesitant to impose tariffs on allies or developing countries alike if it perceives a strategic benefit.

The key question is whether this protectionist approach will truly bring back manufacturing jobs to the U.S., or whether it will merely shift supply chains to countries with lower tariffs — a possibility that could undermine the intended policy outcomes.

In an interconnected economy, trade wars rarely produce clear winners. Instead, they often generate short-term political gains but long-term economic inefficiencies. For businesses and policymakers, the challenge lies in adapting to this volatile trade environment while keeping an eye on sustainable competitiveness.