"Connecting communities, empowering nations: Unifying the Regional and Global Economy ."

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize productivity and drive economic growth, but its impact varies significantly across different sectors. The nature of each industry’s activities, regulatory environments, talent availability, and technological constraints influence how AI is integrated into operations. To fully unlock AI’s benefits, it is crucial to understand the factors that determine AI engagement, including the demand for AI talent, the development of innovative AI applications, AI’s relevance to different occupational tasks, and actual AI adoption rates.

A recent study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provides a framework for assessing AI intensity across economic sectors. The study identifies four key indicators that determine AI engagement: AI talent, AI innovation, AI exposure, and AI adoption. These indicators help explain why some industries are at the forefront of AI transformation while others lag behind.

Four Pillars of AI Intensity

The extent to which AI influences an industry—known as AI intensity—is shaped by four critical factors:

1. AI Talent: Measuring Demand for AI Skills

AI talent is a fundamental driver of AI adoption. The demand for AI-skilled professionals can be gauged through AI-related job vacancies, which indicate the level of investment firms are making in acquiring human capital for AI deployment.

Technology-driven industries such as IT services, media, and telecommunications show a high proportion of AI-related job postings, reflecting a strong need for AI expertise.

Traditional industries like manufacturing and healthcare exhibit a slower uptake, often due to a lack of skilled professionals and the difficulty of integrating AI into legacy systems.


Perspective

A World Economic Forum (WEF) report predicts that AI-related jobs will account for nearly 20% of all new job opportunities in advanced economies by 2030. However, the uneven distribution of AI talent across sectors may widen skill gaps, making it challenging for some industries to capitalize on AI’s benefits.

AI Innovation: The Role of AI Patents in Technological Advancement

The share of AI-related patents serves as a proxy for AI innovation, indicating the extent to which industries are contributing to the development of new AI applications.

IT services and telecommunications lead AI patent filings, as they invest heavily in R&D to refine machine learning algorithms, cloud-based AI solutions, and automation technologies.

Finance and healthcare sectors are increasingly securing AI patents, driven by advancements in AI-driven fraud detection, risk assessment, and medical diagnostics.

AI innovation does not always translate into widespread AI adoption. While some industries develop cutting-edge AI solutions, regulatory constraints, high implementation costs, and industry-specific challenges may delay real-world applications.

For instance, while AI-powered robotic surgery systems have been patented and tested in healthcare, their large-scale adoption remains limited due to ethical concerns, cost barriers, and patient safety regulations.

3. AI Exposure: Potential AI Impact on Tasks and Occupations

AI exposure measures how AI could potentially impact various jobs and tasks across sectors. It considers task automation feasibility while accounting for obstacles such as regulatory constraints, implementation costs, and sectoral resistance.

High-exposure industries: Finance, legal services, and IT, where AI can replace repetitive tasks like data entry, risk analysis, and customer service interactions.

Low-exposure industries: Construction, agriculture, and artisanal trades, where manual labor and physical tasks make AI-driven automation more challenging.

Sectoral Divide

A McKinsey Global Institute (MGI) study estimates that AI could automate up to 50% of tasks in finance and insurance, but only 10-15% of tasks in manufacturing and agriculture due to the complexities of physical labor.

Despite AI’s theoretical ability to enhance efficiency in all industries, AI exposure alone does not determine AI adoption. The presence of structural and financial barriers significantly influences whether AI can be seamlessly integrated.

AI Adoption: The Reality of AI Integration in Businesses

AI adoption represents the actual percentage of firms using AI in their operations. It provides a realistic view of how AI is being deployed across industries.

High adoption sectors: IT services, telecommunications, and media. These industries use AI for automation, recommendation systems, and personalized content delivery.

Moderate adoption sectors: Finance and healthcare, where AI is integrated for fraud detection, risk management, and diagnostic tools.

Low adoption sectors: Agriculture, construction, and traditional manufacturing, where AI adoption remains low due to the high costs of AI integration, workforce resistance, and regulatory concerns.

While AI adoption is growing, barriers such as lack of digital infrastructure, workforce resistance, and regulatory challenges slow down implementation in certain industries. For instance, AI-powered autonomous vehicles have been successfully tested, but their widespread deployment faces legal and ethical hurdles.

AI Leadership: Which Sectors are Driving AI Growth?

Industries that rank highly across all AI intensity dimensions—talent, innovation, exposure, and adoption—are also shaping the AI landscape.

According to the OECD study:

IT services, media, and telecommunications lead in AI intensity. These sectors not only use AI but actively develop AI technologies, driving research and commercial AI applications.

Finance and healthcare rank moderately high, with substantial AI-driven automation but slower adoption rates due to regulatory and ethical challenges.

Manufacturing and logistics are gradually integrating AI, but automation constraints limit AI’s role beyond predictive maintenance and supply chain optimization.

Agriculture and construction lag behind, facing adoption challenges due to the physical nature of their tasks and high investment costs for AI-enabled machinery.

Sectoral Influence on AI Innovation

AI leadership is not only about adopting AI—it is about influencing AI’s future. Industries that invest in AI R&D, patent filings, and AI-driven business models are also shaping AI’s trajectory. This creates an AI divide, where high-intensity sectors accelerate innovation while lagging sectors struggle to keep pace.

Future Outlook

To bridge this AI divide, governments and industries must work together to:

Enhance AI education and reskilling programs to address AI talent shortages.

Encourage AI investment in underrepresented sectors through financial incentives and policy support.

Facilitate AI accessibility by reducing regulatory and cost barriers in low-adoption industries.

Conclusion: The Uneven AI Revolution

While AI holds immense promise for economic transformation, its impact is uneven across sectors. The level of AI intensity in an industry depends on its talent pool, innovation efforts, exposure to AI-driven automation, and actual adoption rates.

Industries at the forefront of AI, such as IT services, media, and telecommunications, are not just leveraging AI—they are defining its future. Meanwhile, sectors such as agriculture, construction, and traditional manufacturing must overcome significant barriers before AI can become a game-changer.

The future of AI-driven growth will depend on how well industries adapt to AI advancements and whether AI accessibility can be extended to all economic sectors. Only then can AI deliver its full economic potential across the global economy.



Key Takeaways

✔ AI intensity varies by industry, with IT, media, and finance leading the way.
✔ AI talent demand is concentrated in high-tech industries, leaving gaps in traditional sectors.
✔ AI innovation (patents) does not always translate into widespread adoption, due to regulatory and economic barriers.
✔ AI exposure highlights automation potential, but implementation depends on cost, regulation, and sectoral needs.
✔ AI adoption is highest in digital-first industries, while physical-labor sectors struggle to integrate AI.
✔ Bridging the AI divide requires policy support, workforce upskilling, and investment incentives for lagging industries.