"Connecting communities, empowering nations: Unifying the Regional and Global Economy ."

Introduction:
India’s agricultural policies and the management of Minimum Support Price (MSP) have been subjects of intense debate and scrutiny for years. The government often argues that providing MSP to all other groups is not feasible in terms of physical management and fiscal stability. However, closer examination reveals that the fiscal burden of procurement and food management is more complex than initially presented. These lines delves into the three main components of the food economy – procurement, storage, and distribution – to shed light on the true nature of the fiscal burden and propose potential solutions to mitigate it.

Understanding the Components:

To comprehend the fiscal burden, it is crucial to segregate the three components of the food economy: procurement, storage, and distribution. Procurement refers to the cost incurred in acquiring the grain from farmers, while storage involves preserving and maintaining the grain stocks. Lastly, distribution refers to the process of delivering the grain to consumers.

Mismanagement and Fiscal Burden:

India’s food grain stocks reached a record-breaking 120 million tonnes in 2021 – the highest anywhere in the world. However, due to mismanagement, the government was reluctant to distribute the grain, leading to increased storage costs. It is essential to recognize that this cost of storage is separate from the procurement expenses, thus not directly related to the fiscal burden. The fiscal burden of procurement is just a fraction of the total cost of managing the food economy.

Impact of Agricultural Policies:

Over the past few decades, mismanagement and the liberalization of agricultural policies have caused the overall cost of managing the food economy to soar. Deregulation and liberalization have resulted in low open market prices, forcing farmers to rely on the public procurement system to sell their produce and make a profit. While this strategy helps farmers in the short term, it increases the burden on the government and distorts the market.

Synchronization and Sustainable Solutions:

To address the fiscal burden, the government must synchronize the three key aspects of the food economy: cost of production, farmer’s price realization, and distribution. Subsidizing the cost of production benefits all farmers, including the smaller producers who might struggle in the market. Simultaneously, proper procurement measures are vital, as distributing without sufficient procurement undermines the stability of the system.

Moreover, liberalizing input provisioning without increasing procurement further exacerbates the burden. It is crucial to strike a balance that supports farmers’ profitability while minimizing the overall fiscal burden on the government.

Mitigating the Fiscal Burden:

1. Targeted MSP: Implementing a targeted MSP system, where the government provides a support price based on specific categories of farmers, can help reduce the overall fiscal burden. This approach ensures that only those in need receive the support, thereby optimizing resource allocation.

2. Diversification of Agriculture: Encouraging crop diversification can help reduce the burden on specific crops, such as rice and wheat, which require substantial government procurement. Promoting alternative crops can lead to a more balanced supply-demand dynamics and alleviate the fiscal burden.

3. Enhancing Storage Infrastructure: Investing in modern storage infrastructure can help minimize wastage and reduce storage costs. Suitable facilities, such as silos and cold storage, can preserve grains effectively and efficiently, limiting the burden on the Government.

4. Efficient Distribution: Streamlining distribution systems through technological interventions and improved logistics can minimize wastage and ensure that procured grain reaches consumers promptly. This efficiency can alleviate the fiscal burden caused by oversupply or bottlenecks in distribution.

The fiscal burden associated with food procurement, storage, and distribution in India is a multifaceted issue that requires careful examination and consideration. While the government often presents the fiscal burden as a barrier to implementing MSP for all groups, it is important to recognize that the situation is a result of mismanagement and flawed policies rather than just the cost of procurement.

By synchronizing the cost of production, farmer’s price realization, and distribution, it is possible to not only alleviate the fiscal burden but also ensure sustainable and inclusive agricultural practices. Implementing targeted MSP, encouraging crop diversification, investing in infrastructure, and improving distribution systems are vital steps toward achieving this goal. By addressing the root causes and reshaping policies, India can create a more efficient and equitable agricultural system that benefits both farmers and the economy as a whole.