"Connecting communities, empowering nations: Unifying the Regional and Global Economy ."

The recent discourse around the potential development of an alternative currency among BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—has sparked global curiosity. Proponents argue that such a currency could potentially challenge the dominance of the U.S. dollar in international trade and strengthen economic ties among these emerging economies. However, the practicalities of creating a shared currency are riddled with challenges, including political tensions, economic disparities, and global market skepticism. This blog delves into the underlying motivations, possible economic impacts, and critical issues surrounding a BRICS currency initiative.

The Motivation for a BRICS Currency

One of the primary motivations behind the proposal for a BRICS currency is to reduce dependency on the U.S. dollar, which dominates global trade and finance. Approximately 88% of global foreign exchange transactions involve the U.S. dollar, underscoring its significant role as a reserve currency. This reliance can make countries vulnerable to U.S. monetary policy shifts and sanctions, which may negatively affect BRICS members, particularly Russia, which has faced economic sanctions in recent years.

The BRICS countries collectively represent around 41% of the global population and account for roughly 24% of global GDP. These economic players argue that a new currency framework could allow them to increase their influence in global trade and finance, creating a counterbalance to Western-dominated financial institutions. By settling trade in an alternative currency, BRICS nations could enhance trade efficiency, reduce currency conversion costs, and mitigate risks from dollar volatility.

Economic Feasibility and Structure

Developing a BRICS currency would require complex economic alignment. The BRICS economies vary widely in terms of economic size, stability, and monetary policy:

China has the second-largest economy globally and maintains a trade surplus.

India has a growing economy but relies heavily on imports, leading to trade deficits.

Brazil and South Africa are resource-based economies, subject to commodity price volatility.

Russia faces significant geopolitical and economic constraints due to international sanctions.


To navigate these differences, the BRICS currency could function as a supranational currency similar to the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) or be pegged to a basket of BRICS currencies. This pegging approach could stabilize the currency’s value while reducing individual currency fluctuations. However, implementing such a mechanism would require intensive coordination on exchange rate policies, inflation control, and fiscal policies—a level of integration that BRICS nations have yet to achieve.

Trade Patterns and Reserve Dependency

Data from recent years indicates that intra-BRICS trade is growing, yet remains modest compared to BRICS countries’ trade with developed economies. For instance:

China-India trade reached around $125 billion in 2022, but most BRICS trade relationships are heavily China-centric.

Brazil’s exports to China, for instance, were valued at $89.7 billion in 2022, reflecting dependency on bilateral trade rather than multilateral BRICS integration.


Furthermore, data from the IMF shows that over 60% of global reserves are held in U.S. dollars, while the Chinese yuan constitutes less than 3% of reserves. Shifting reserve preferences would require not only a stable BRICS currency but also global confidence in its durability and liquidity—a tall order for a new currency.

Potential Economic Impacts

1. Reduced Transaction Costs: An alternative BRICS currency could simplify cross-border trade by eliminating the need for currency exchanges into dollars, benefiting companies by reducing costs.


2. Increased Economic Autonomy: With a currency independent of Western influence, BRICS nations could shield their economies from potential U.S.-imposed financial restrictions.


3. Enhanced BRICS Influence: A BRICS currency could strengthen the coalition’s geopolitical stance, allowing them to negotiate global trade terms with greater leverage.


4. Exchange Rate Stability: If the currency were pegged to a basket of BRICS currencies, it might provide more exchange rate stability among these nations.


Critical Issues and Challenges

1. Political Tensions and Divergent Interests: The BRICS nations have competing strategic interests and diplomatic tensions, such as between China and India, which may complicate the development of a unified currency framework.


2. Currency Stability and Inflation Management: Diverging inflation rates, particularly in Brazil and South Africa, would necessitate collective monetary policies, which would compromise individual nations’ economic sovereignty.


3. Liquidity and Global Acceptance: Creating a currency that is both stable and globally accepted would require substantial foreign exchange reserves and market infrastructure, including clearing mechanisms and liquidity support, which may take years to build.


4. Technological Infrastructure: A digital currency backed by blockchain technology could be a solution for transparency and security. However, the technology required for secure transactions and to prevent currency manipulation needs significant investment, especially for countries with less digital infrastructure.

Geopolitical Ramifications

The BRICS currency initiative could shift the geopolitical landscape by creating a multipolar currency framework. Should the currency gain traction, it might embolden other emerging economies to seek alternatives to the U.S. dollar, potentially fragmenting the current global monetary system. However, such an initiative could also provoke a reaction from Western economies, leading to increased trade restrictions or financial oversight on BRICS transactions.

A Step Forward or Mere Speculation?

While the idea of a BRICS currency presents an intriguing opportunity for global economic rebalancing, achieving it remains a complex and uncertain endeavor. Differences in political priorities, economic policies, and market structures pose significant obstacles. The creation of an alternative currency is possible, but it would require unwavering commitment, careful economic planning, and substantial financial resources from all BRICS members.

Ultimately, the BRICS currency debate underscores a broader question about the future of global financial dominance. If the BRICS nations succeed, even partially, it may mark the beginning of a multipolar currency era where emerging economies assert more influence on global trade terms. However, without consensus and a strong framework, the BRICS currency may remain a speculative idea, limited by practical and geopolitical barriers.